How should I price a cold email/LinkedIn outreach service for B2B consultants, and are my proposed prices too high?
I’d start with a setup fee in the $2,500‑$5,000 range and then charge per meeting—something like $200‑$400 each—or take a modest revenue‑share of 5‑20%. Those numbers aren’t crazy as long as the lifetime value of a client justifies them. Expect push‑back; no one sells a system without objections. A setup fee in that range is reasonable for the value you’ll deliver. For context, a full‑service B2B consulting package can run $15K a year, but freelance consultants typically charge less. If you can close a $5K deal a month and charge $200 per meeting, even with a low conversion rate (say 1 in 8 meetings), the cost per deal drops to about $1,600, leaving room to price around $3.2K and still be competitive. If you’re unsure, check out my video on value‑based pricing for a deeper dive.
Look at it from the customer’s perspective. If you’re delivering, say, $4,500 worth of value each month, you can charge a multiple of that amount. In B2B you typically charge a percentage of the revenue you generate for the client—about 30 % of top‑line revenue and, for bottom‑line improvements, up to 50 % of the margin you save them. In your specific case the $400 a month is a cost you’re passing on, so I recommend not adding extra liabilities. Have the client pay for the ongoing costs directly—charge a setup fee for the cold‑email domains and let the client cover the monthly expense. You can then charge a monthly retainer, a percentage of revenue, or any other model you prefer. For more detail on the many pricing models, check out my previous video where I break down about 80 different ways to price a service.
He explains that the best pricing models are nuanced and combine multiple elements: an upfront setup fee, a monthly retainer, pay-per-meeting, and possibly a revenue share. He describes his former business partner Grender, who uses all three—setup fee, monthly retainer (around $5,000 per month), and either pay-per-meeting or revenue share—on annual contracts. He prefers month-to-month arrangements to avoid being tied down, charging per meeting and differentiating fees based on client value—for example, higher compensation for meetings that lead to larger deals (e.g., $15,000 versus $5,000). He cites a community member who introduced a lead that resulted in a $700,000 deal, noting a 5% revenue share would yield $35,000. He concludes by thanking viewers for joining his journey to 300,000 subscribers and looks forward to reaching 1 million.
I’m currently branding the service as coaching rather than consulting. Community members get it for $1,000, but I’m considering raising the price to about $2,000 or making it inaccessible because the current pricing doesn’t make sense time‑wise.
I ran a wedding videography agency, then diversified into corporate events, but the model is location‑dependent and not very scalable. Cold email gives global reach, yet forces you to stay local unless you build a contractor network. You can send about 5,000 emails a day, which is your entire addressable market in a day. Videographers cost $50‑$100 per hour with a six‑hour minimum, so a day’s labor is roughly $300. Charging $2,500 per job leaves a ~40% cost margin, which is acceptable.