What if you built a high-ticket 'inner circle' community on top of your low-ticket coaching communities? You'd make revenue from the low-ticket communities (Make Money with Make, Maker School) plus the high-ticket one, and people would ascend from free content up through low-ticket into the high-ticket group — like an Hormozi-style tiered ladder.
This is more or less what I was already thinking. I want a roadmap of ascension: people enter through something like Maker School, then a mid-tier (I need a better name than 'Make Money with Make', open to suggestions), then a high-ticket tier at the top, and ideally people naturally move up as I deliver value. Right now I'm missing that middle-to-high step — I have people who want to give me $10,000/month but I don't have anything to actually offer them at that level, and it doesn't feel scalable with my time since they'd expect a lot more hands-on service.
tiered offersascension ladderhigh ticket community
I’ve thought about creating an info product, but it feels too circular and I don’t want to be part of that AI‑economy‑joke where everyone’s investing in each other’s pockets. High‑ticket products also don’t appeal to me; they’re annoying and would make me unhappy even if they could generate millions. I prefer hands‑on work that directly helps people, especially beginners who are starting from zero. Building something from the ground up and watching newcomers succeed is far more fulfilling than adding a little extra revenue for already wealthy owners. So I’m steering clear of high‑ticket offers and focusing on low‑ticket, high‑impact education that serves a broader audience.
First I take stock of where we are. I have roughly 50 k followers across platforms, which currently generates about $128 k profit per month, or roughly $2.56 of profit per member. Michelle’s question is how to raise that per‑member profit to about $3.34 without adding more members.
To do that I need higher‑ticket products and additional revenue streams. My current product, Maker School, is $66 /month. I’m capped at that price point, so I can’t simply raise it. I’m thinking about creating a third, higher‑ticket offering—something like a $20 k‑per‑year advisory or mastermind that takes a percentage of the client’s revenue. For example, a $6 k annual fee plus 5 % of revenue would generate about $36 k from a client making $50 k a month.
The idea is to layer a low‑ticket (Maker School), a mid‑ticket, and a high‑ticket offering that helps members monetize, retain, and convert better, thereby increasing the average revenue per member from $2.56 to $3.34. Simpler options like selling templates could also add revenue, but the most direct way is to introduce a high‑ticket community or advisory service that captures a share of the growth we help generate.
The niche of early career structural engineers is tiny—about 3,000 total, capping at roughly 150 members even with a strong conversion rate. To scale you have two options: charge a higher ticket to the same audience, or find adjacent niches (e.g., early‑career civil or electrical engineers) and copy about 80% of the program with minor tweaks. You could also teach cold email as part of the offering. Essentially, either raise price or expand to similar audiences.
The growth operator model works well because it lets you make bold, results‑based guarantees—like promising to add $150 K/month in six months—by improving a client’s revenue levers by a realistic percentage (e.g., 15% over six months, about 2.5% per month). If the client already generates high cash flow, such a lift is credible and achievable. I especially like applying this to content businesses, where you can promise concrete outcomes such as adding $20 K/month within three months or even more extravagant rewards, as long as the client isn’t opposed. Starting with a narrow niche—like school community owners—lets you build proof points and credibility quickly, then you can expand to broader creator markets once you have a track record. This approach balances focus with scalability.