Can you explain your content creation process, especially ideation and editing, given you edit videos yourself for quick turnover?

#248 · i made $12k in 24 hours by un-pausing my content

Can you explain your content creation process, especially ideation and editing, given you edit videos yourself for quick turnover?

My content creation process begins with recognizing that my videos haven’t been performing well recently, which serves as a reminder not to pause content creation. I believe it’s better to focus on producing one truly excellent video rather than many mediocre ones. My average performance is boosted by strong search‑based results, but when I look at raw numbers, the performance has been lackluster. I therefore share my current, imperfect process: I start by considering two or three different approaches, aiming to shift toward making videos I genuinely care about, even if short‑term metrics suffer, because long‑term performance improves when I’m more aligned with my interests. I make a good living, so I don’t need to chase short‑term views, but I acknowledge that beginners must prioritize metrics. My recommendation is to base decisions on search trends—using tools like Google Trends to identify high‑performing search terms in your niche over the past two weeks, since platforms and strategies emerge and fade quickly (e.g., the recent Fable trend). Once you have a sense of what people are searching for, see how you can fit your existing activities into those topics. For example, if part of your workflow involves a token‑optimization technique you tested for a couple of days, make a video about it. The challenging part is packaging—crafting a title and thumbnail that work well together. I haven’t fully mastered this yet, but you can try outlier matching or rely on developing intuition about what works; most of my attempts don’t succeed, perhaps around 70% of the time, so I focus on high volume and accept that only about 30% of my videos will be remembered positively. My top‑performing recent video, which gained 77,000 views in 9 hours and 53 minutes, covered topical subjects like Claude manage agents, Claude Opus 4.7, and Claude routines—these do well in the short term, which is how I’m currently judged. However, the video that has generated the most revenue for me is not on that list; it’s my Claude code course. That video was 100% search‑based: I searched for a full Claude code course, found none, recognized the opportunity, and created the course at the right time, earning roughly $30,000 and continuing to grow. Regarding other ideas, a viewer suggested uploading the content to Spotify for morning listening; I think that’s a great idea and plan to explore adding a Spotify upload to my workflow. In terms of growth, my subscriber count is currently 464,288, with a modest 0.16% increase recently, while my Instagram engagement has risen from an average of 0.05‑0.11% to 0.37% after consistent posting. If I had continued growing at 0.11% I’d reach about 609,000 followers by year‑end, but with the current 3.7% growth rate I’m on track for roughly one million followers. My X (Twitter) account has 2,701 followers, which jumped by 70 in the last 24 hours—a 2.58% increase that feels significant, though I’m still figuring out how X works. Maker Zero, my community, now has 1,345 members, a 44% increase, placing us in second position, with the Maker Zero ranking itself having risen dramatically. Overall, I see the recent surge in content posting as having reversed prior declines, essentially recouping losses from three weeks of inactivity with just a modest amount of new content. I’m eager to keep this momentum going, try new formats, and possibly record an extra video before my upcoming trip to Vancouver to avoid slipping back into old habits. Imagine if I had published one video a day from February 1, 2024, through today—that would exceed 700 videos. Even if they weren’t polished, simply speaking openly about what I care about would have built a core audience that appreciates my daily updates and received substantial value from them. I believe my content is genuinely more helpful than most, and I want as many people as possible to benefit from it because understanding AI and automation will be crucial for future economic success. By spreading this knowledge, I hope to accelerate the transition to a more effective economy. I’ve been硬on

content creationideationeditingsearch trends

Related answers

youtube ↗Marketing

Should I focus on pushing content regularly or prioritize high-quality content at a slower pace? If starting from scratch, what videos would you make?

Well, I wouldn't be in your situation in the first place. It doesn't make sense to start a YouTube channel or talk about stuff until you've actually delivered value in the past. If your revenue is less than $20,000 a month, you shouldn't be running this channel right now because lead volume will be too variable and there's nothing to build a business around. Spending time just touching up your content and trying to make it really high quality completely defeats the purpose—believe it or not, your content doesn't have to be very high quality as long as you're somebody worth listening to. For example, I'm just in my room in a tank top after a shower; I might not know what I'm talking about when I started this video, but it's still worth listening to because I've achieved outcomes that a lot of people here want to achieve, and I've consolidated a lot of knowledge. The two are valuable together, but the actual quality of the content aside from that knowledge and the perceived value of being associated with me isn't anywhere near as high. So the hack is: you need to do good first. Don't start a content business and then run another business side by side. Start the other business, crush it, achieve massive success, and then make videos talking about it. If you do anything else, you're really just putting the carpet before the horse and wasting your time.

content strategypersonal brandyoutube

youtube ↗Mindset

How do you learn the topics behind your videos and find time for it while managing other commitments?

The reason I can make really long videos is that I use the software in my day‑to‑day work long enough to know it thoroughly, then I just record a video on it—no extra learning time needed. For example, I recorded a 6.5‑hour Claude Code marketing course and published it without spending a second learning for it; every build I showed was from client work over the past year. This lets me turn on the camera and start talking immediately. It’s not the highest quality content per minute, but it unlocks much higher volume, letting me make videos on topics I’m already good at. The secret to high‑volume, high‑growth content creation is to make a lot of content, but you can’t do that if you have to research and pre‑produce an hour every day for a 10‑minute video. So, make content only on stuff you’re really good at, which requires you to become exceptional in that field first—this makes you interesting. In short, don’t make videos all day unless you have something worthwhile to film about; when you do, you’ll be good enough at it that you won’t need much pre‑production and can be more natural.

learningtime managementcontent creation

youtube ↗AI & Automation

How do you train LLMs and test accuracy, and what advice do you have for a newbie willing to work daily?

Good stuff. My recommendation for you, Curbman, is that we're not actually training the LLMs—that's a common misconception. What we do is applied AI: we take the work from companies like OpenAI, who build and train the models on vast datasets, and we sell it to businesses. We're not doing any training ourselves; we just give the model examples of what we want it to do, which some people call training but it's different from actual model training. Regarding testing the accuracy of the model as stated in the video, it's simple: set up an accuracy test prompt, run it multiple times (e.g., 10, 20, 50, 100, or 1,000 times) on slightly different inputs with the same prompt, score each run, then average the scores. For example, if you get scores like 93, 96, 95, 92, 97, 95, 93, 97, 97, 99, the average is 95.4, which exceeds a 95% threshold, so you can use the model. To be thorough, you can then test with a dumber model and continue down the list to ensure you stay above the threshold; this can be fully automated. I once set up such an automation for my content writing workflow. In terms of expectations, things usually take longer than you think, but once you get initial traction, results accelerate—it's asymmetrical. For me, I wasn't planning to make over $300,000 this month; I thought I'd make around 190k–200k, but I made 1.5 times that because I'd put in daily inputs long enough to be rewarded when it blew up. As for the biggest pain points in our automation services, idea generation was a major issue until we solved it by repurposing YouTube comments and using tools like '1 of 10' to find trending formats, then applying my industry knowledge to make them unique. One of my highest‑performing videos was a clone of a popular video, but I rebranded it to AI and automation—'Watch me do an AI version of this and sell AI.' Editing is also a big pain point; while you can't fully automate it, content repurposing helps. Creators often treat their main YouTube channel as the source and create short‑form offshoots on other platforms. I've tried to address this using creator rewards, though it's hard to measure attribution—we have around 300,000 views but can't track exactly how well it's working. I'll keep you posted.

llmaccuracy testingexpectationsidea generation

youtube ↗Mindset

What one piece of advice would you give to your younger self?

If I could give one piece of advice to my younger self, it would be to understand that outputs lag behind inputs. When you put in a lot of work, you won’t see the results immediately because there’s a natural delay—often about a month—before the effort pays off. If you have a tight feedback loop and expect quick results, remind yourself that the lack of immediate outcomes doesn’t mean your effort was wasted; it’s just the system’s lag. To work with this, ground yourself in the belief that what you’re doing is right, based on the logic and research you’ve done. Trust that belief deeply, and keep going. For example, if you were to send ten Loom videos daily to creators you admire and message them on platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, or X, you’d mathematically expect a result. By sticking with it over a long period, the inputs eventually catch up to the outputs, and you start seeing results. I learned this from my own experience: I blogged every day for 30 days as part of a challenge, saw almost no views, and felt discouraged. But a year later, those posts were ranking on Google’s first page, driving hundreds of hits and sales opportunities. Had I kept that pace, I would have become one of the more prolific bloggers online. The same pattern happened with my YouTube channel—once I committed to daily videos for a month, the market rewarded me later, and I grew into a bigger, respected creator in my space. So, if you believe in your work, give yourself grace and extra time—maybe double or triple your estimate for when results will appear. That heuristic makes success far more likely.

outputs lagpatiencelong-term thinkingfeedback loop