Is making Loom videos a replacement for cold email, or should you use both, or just for Upwork applications?
The reason I recommend a distinct profile picture color is that many freelancers on Upwork have cluttered backgrounds that don't stand out. Using an unnatural or natural contrasting color (like Harsh or Frank) makes your profile pop when scrolling through proposals, helping you get noticed.
Using Loom videos in cold emails works and can be effective, but it lowers deliverability because links and media trigger spam filters. You trade volume for personalization—send fewer, highly tailored emails with a Loom video that shows you’ve already built the asset, which creates a pattern break and raises perceived value. To compensate for lower deliverability, reduce volume or improve mailbox practices. It’s not fully scalable like pure text cold email, but it’s a valuable tactic when you need to stand out.
On Upwork definitely use your real face—it's a corporate platform and clients want to work with you not a cartoon avatar. Your profile picture matters less if your presentation is strong but a genuine photo builds trust. Recording custom Loom videos for proposals makes a huge difference; aim to maximize the success chance of each individual proposal. Two reasons: first for newcomers custom Looms let you practice and deliver your value proposition without the cost or stress of live calls or cold outreach effectively giving you free sales‑rep practice. Second personalized outreach maximizes the return on every dollar you spend on Upwork connects—if someone watches your video you want the highest chance they'll convert. In short use a real face and invest in tailored Loom videos to get the most out of your Upwork spending.
Email deliverability isn’t a simple spam‑or‑not‑spam binary; it’s more like a sliding scale. Adding a link to an email nudges it toward the spam side, but excellent copywriting can pull it back toward the inbox. Adding images moves it further toward spam, yet a strong warm‑up routine, a pristine list, and high engagement can still keep you in the inbox. If you send a Loom video that’s incredibly high‑value and gets a great response, you might willingly take a small deliverability hit because the back‑end conversion makes up for it. Likewise, cutting your daily email volume—say, from 25‑30 down to 5‑10—improves your sender reputation and helps the mailbox provider see you as a real user. Platforms like Instantly let you run separate campaigns (e.g., a Loom‑video‑only campaign) and monitor deliverability on just those mailboxes, so you can isolate any impact. In short, when I say Loom personalized videos are the best form of cold outreach, I’m talking about using them to apply for jobs on Upwork (and similarly via Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn DMs, and email).
The Loom video approach was terrible for me. My other approach was sending a lead magnet (a Google doc). To reconcile scale with customization, there are two approaches: low volume, high customization—sending a personalized Loom video that solves a problem, delivers value, and builds a warm connection to maybe 10‑30 people a day; and high volume, low result—blasting a generic “do you mind if I send you a Loom video?” to a million people and only recording when they reply. The latter is overdone and saturated; it’s not effective anymore.