Do you think AI avatars are good for blue-collar work advertising, such as top of funnel, middle of funnel, and product reviews, or will they hurt credibility?
Very interesting question. I think your issue is you are attempting to find leverage where it probably doesn't make sense. Why not just record your ads yourself? If you're going to go through the process of scripting them and stuff like that, just record a video of you saying it. You're trying to make your team seem larger. Actually, there's a tremendous amount of value in consolidating that team into one public-facing person. If they like, you know, a piece of content that they watch with you, then when they see an ad of you in their feed, you'll get significantly lower CPMs. So, I think you're just trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. What are you planning on doing? Spinning up 4,000 AI avatars talking about all different types of of services and whatnot? No, I mean, if you're here on my channel asking me that question, you probably don't have the ad budget. So, don't worry about that at all. Just do it yourself. I don't know if you've noticed, but I do all my videos entirely myself. I also do all my ads entirely myself. And the reason why is because this is the most important part of my business. It is the top of my funnel. It is the step that every single person that ever gives me any money needs to go through before they eventually get to the point where they transform into a paying customer or client. If you think about it that way, you'll realize that there is no point in trying to save money at this stage. You should focus entirely on growing, not saving. And all AI agents or AI ad avatars and UGCs things can do for you at that stage is typically save.
My AI and automation agency makes significantly less money than my coaching. Coaching is extraordinarily scalable—when you run a YouTube channel with distribution like I do, the optimal next choice is to sell something hyperscalable with zero delivery or logistics, which is what my coaching stuff is. If you're a total beginner, your optimal choice changes depending on whether you have distribution: with distribution, you'd go for e‑commerce or info‑product with a templated service; without distribution, you'd run an agency because agencies let you get your first 10, 20, $50k in revenue super quickly. Agencies allow you to make a lot of money very quickly, but you tend to plateau relatively fast, with further gains being incremental. Contrast that with an information product business (like a community or SaaS), which has zero marginal cost after a fixed development cost, so you make little money at first but way more later. Does this make sense? From my perspective, when I started my agency I was up here, made money quickly, hit resistance, wanted to scale with as little headcount as possible, moved over here, and now I'm significantly higher. Would I recommend doing what I'm doing now to total beginners? No—many people throw away their businesses after starting coaching because they stop doing the main service, become disconnected from implementation, lose skill, and start teaching the wrong way. That's why this YouTube channel is valuable: I'm showing you how I actually generate leads for my agency. I want to change the fraction of my total revenue that comes from this channel; I don't think it's the most effective use of my time per dollar, but I believe it will indirectly lead to more money through authenticity, so I'm getting back to selling outbound for the agency, setting up more inbound funnels, adding calls‑to‑action at the end of videos, and going to hire a team eventually.
You clearly have an extremely valuable set of skills; your question is how to take this valuable set of skills to market. Very few people can get 300 million views in two years—you could genuinely change the course of the global economy with this skill, and millions of politicians would be interested in achieving 300 million views in two years organically on a super broke budget. So this sounds pretty good. The thing is you need distribution to begin with; you could show your current audience how to do that. That’s reasonable. But you should also leverage the systems you already have that enable you to do it—this is just your bottleneck. Six to eight hours to make a video is tough; you could bring that down to three or four hours, allowing you to make two videos for two approaches. In six months you’d have a solid base to sell—maybe a fitness channel program or something similar. That’s probably what I’d do.
What a great question. This is more a consulting and strategy perspective than a building one. Naturally, if you're trying to make more money and thinking, 'Ooh, what's a way to make more money? I know AI is all the rage—maybe we'll add an AI chatbot to our website,' but if the chatbot doesn't talk to anybody, it won't make you more money. You've stumbled on a universal problem for many service businesses: they just don't have any leads. The real point of value, the bottleneck you could fix, is usually lead generation. I don't know how many people visit their site daily, monthly, or yearly, so it's hard to suggest exactly what to do next, but you're on the right track. The usual thinking is: get leads first, then worry about optimizing how you deal with them, nurture them, and improve conversion rates later. In your opinion, what's the best automation to sell? Could you make a video on it? The best automation to sell is something that increases or encourages lead generation, which we discussed. One of the main systems I sell is a cold outreach system where I build distribution for someone from scratch for about $200–$300 a month ongoing. They start with zero leads in their pipeline—usually an agency—and after the system is set up, they get roughly 30 leads per month that want to book calls. This is a game-changer and easy to justify as an investment for companies whose bottleneck is lead generation, like most businesses under $50k–$100k per month in revenue. Think of it this way: I'm solving their most dire problem—no leads entering the business. I charge them $3,000–$4,000 a month, which is fine because without me they wouldn't even have a business making more than $3k–$4k a month. In my experience, the best automations to sell for small to mid-sized businesses are those that help the top of the funnel. If they already have an outbound system but aren't getting many leads, I'd recommend a speed-to-lead system. Anything close to the top of the funnel—whether outbound or inbound—helps a lot, and that's what I'd recommend.
I don’t know the specifics of your product, but mimicking what’s working for others is a reasonable first step. The tactics I use in my own social‑media advertising involve spending a lot of money for time, which isn’t ideal for you because you have plenty of time but limited cash. Instead of giving you a detailed walk‑through of my exact methods, let’s look at your situation more generally.
You’ve spent a lot of time building a tool that helps people go viral. The usual approach is to keep investing time and money into the product and then hope marketing will magically work later. That’s the opposite of what you should do. It’s far more effective to start by marketing and selling, then build the product only after you’ve validated demand. If you begin with demand, you’ll already have customers and a clear idea of what they actually want when you finally create the tool.
Rather than building a big inbound funnel for a product that might become obsolete, reach out directly to potential users. Pitch hypothetical offers or tools you could build if they show interest. For example, you could say, “Hey, I’m transitioning to software and think I could save you $10‑15k a month with a tool that does X, Y, Z. Would you be interested in a free version?” If they say yes, you have validation without even having a finished product. Modern AI lets you build functional tools quickly, so you can test ideas fast.
My recommendation: focus all your time and energy on marketing first. Validate the product through outbound outreach. If validation fails, iterate and try a new idea. This outbound‑first approach is the 80/20 play many high‑growth agencies use today, especially with AI accelerating development.
In practice, avoid inbound because it’s undirected and slow to show ROI. Set a target number of outreach contacts and define clear exit conditions—e.g., at least five booked meetings from a thousand messages. If you hit those metrics, then you proceed to build the product. Remember, you can market and sell an idea without a finished product; you just need a compelling concept and a way to communicate it.