What are your thoughts on the agent‑agent protocol replacing the need for no‑code platforms or multi‑agent frameworks as a preferred workflow method?
I think the agent‑agent protocol is pretty cool, but I don’t think it makes too much sense to use an agent multi‑agent framework right now. There’s a lot of early hype with these technologies, followed by a crest/valley of disappointment, and after 6‑12 months the tech gets good—we’re at that point with multi‑agent frameworks. I don’t think the tech is anywhere near as good as building a simple traditional workflow, though I’ve experimented with both platforms and like them; they’re cool.
I’m not very familiar with building agents in Python or LangChain, but most modern agentic flows are now built in platforms like NAN. In my view agents aren’t a good solution for many business use cases, so I wouldn’t recommend them.
The best way to create agents with a team right now is something like Bugs, where you can vary it with tools like Slack, Claw, Tag, Linear, or Cursor, adding more functions as needed, and you're okay using those models. If you want a framework to collaboratively use agents within teams and want those agents to be able to do whatever you need, check out Buzz Agent. It's a beautiful yellow-associated tool that lets you use virtually any sort of agent and looks similar to Slack. For example, the Bumble New Direction team moved their prototype to Flutter, and the Bumble agent indicates they're doing things right now. You can use it with any agents you want; I've signed up and find it visually beautiful and stimulating, with no major downsides. The problem is already solved: it's just a matter of building system prompts so each persistent agent has its own identity and high quality.
ai agentsproject managementcollaborationbuzz agent
I basically already have one — it's Linear (a project management/issue-tracking platform, usually used by coding teams), integrated one-for-one with Claude. I use Claude to both track my to-dos and manage them: if I tag something 'agent ready,' it automatically gets delegated to an agent. I have subgroups for different areas too — like a content pipeline I can delegate pieces of to people or to agents running skills. It's really just a run-of-the-mill CRM with a bunch of agentic tools layered on — but honestly, that's all you actually need.