#106 · I'm going to go from 100K to 500K subscribers. This is how.

youtube ↗AI & Automation

How many operations are needed to run 10,000 personalized emails with asset creation, what Make plan is best, and should agency automation be built as one big flow or many smaller flows?

Yeah, so for big builds, don't just do it all in one shot; avoid big all-encompassing systems because scope creep usually leads to a situation where you haven't clearly defined what you’ll do for the client, which is impossible to specify ahead of time, causing the client to expect something you didn’t agree to for payment, breeding resentment and harming the relationship. Instead, start with a small starter project that’s tightly scoped and agreed upon by both sides, then vibe each other out to learn what the client likes and demonstrate your aptitude—this lets you pitch more later and gives you insight into their business before committing to a massive scope. If you’re doing this for a company and need to send 10,000 depersonalized emails, think logically: using Make, first you get the leads (one op), then you iterate through the leads (n ops), generate icebreakers (another n ops), and optionally upload to Instantly (another n ops) or bulk‑upload to Google Sheets (effectively one op). Roughly, that’s about three n ops, or two n ops if you use the bulk‑upload shortcut. For 10,000 records that works out to roughly 20,000 operations, give or take. As for the Make plan, the $34‑per‑month Core plan gives you 40,000 ops, plenty of headroom; you don’t need the Pro plan unless you want better error handling, in which case the Pro plan is $62. You can start with Core and upgrade later, paying only the difference. On a personal note, I’m about twenty minutes into this video and feeling locked in; I’ve gotten more done today than in the past week because I’ve committed to stop daily posting on my main channel. My growth has slowed—my first‑24‑hour view‑to‑subscriber ratio dropped from about 15% (≈15,000 views on 100k subs) to around 5% (≈5,000 views). Comments suggest this is because my niche‑specific content has saturated its audience, and broadening the topic would attract less‑interested viewers. Elrico noted that my recent videos repeat earlier material, which may also be hurting growth, and suggested exploring other tools besides Make, like voice agents and live builds. Parker joked about throwing me on while cooking to start a riot over quitting daily, and shared ideas such as adding an automation bucket for publicly traded codes to save Coinbase money, using customer‑support headcount as an input for percentage assessments, and targeting big logos to pull in the right audience. My daily updates channel now has about 5,600 subscribers, while the main channel sits at 110,750. I’m checking follower‑count tools like Trend Hero, though I’m not sure about the daily‑limit metric. Reflecting on all this feedback, I’ve decided to stop posting daily and instead pursue a multifaceted strategy: focus on what makes me unique—my calm, low‑production‑value, high‑signal‑to‑noise conversational content—and develop a new, less‑replicable format. With my team, we’ve decided to pursue the “complete and utter uncopyable thing”: building a business with this stuff in front of everybody, doing it extraordinarily well by spending time generating leads, selling them, securing proposals, onboarding clients, fulfilling projects, and growing the company. Nobody else can replicate that live business‑building demonstration. My earlier live video of starting and selling an AI service in ten hours went viral precisely because it proved I can generate leads on camera; it’s a litmus test for knowing how to do this.

makeopsagencyflows

Related answers

youtube ↗Lead Generation

Hey Nick, this is Ocean from Maker School. I made 3,387 from Upwork following the program. Quick plug, but I currently feel stuck mainly due to my work apps tanking despite getting 100% JSS and a much stronger portfolio. I've sent 142 over the past 30 days, only 16 reviewed with zero higher. So, you have a view rate of what's that like 8% something like that? No, 12%. The good news is I've been nailing the consistency as I'm approaching a 30-day posting streak and 22 days of five or more upper caps despite dealing with two jobs and a bunch of life issues, which derailed me initially from maker school. I've also restarted to learn cold email and scrape 2.7K from vain today. My question is, what would you do in my situation of about $1,500 in earnings from Upwork left and about 2,000 connects to spend. My goal is to make 5K per month to quit my job and be in one of your case studies when I make my first 10K a month as I believe I have quite a unique set of traits that could broaden the maker school demographic being Asian and also born in New Zealand.

You're sending about four proposals per day on average. If you increased that to 10 per day (2.5× more), you'd see roughly 2.5× more results. Your main bottleneck is the view rate, currently around 12 %; improving your CV, profile, how it stands out, and your writing to avoid generic templates could push that to 20‑25 %. Make sure the first 150 characters show you read the post, give something free, and present yourself as a professional. With a 12 % view rate, 16 viewed proposals translate to about five replies, which is rough but not hopeless. In my early days I sent 20‑25 proposals a day; I would have completed your 30‑day volume in about five and a half days, outperforming you six‑fold on views alone. Even without improving my view rate, that would have yielded roughly 90 views, around 30 replies, and three or four calls—enough to eventually land a deal. You can make up for any shortfall in volume with strategic effort, something I've done since day one. I'd still recommend you do it more effectively, but the principle holds.

upworkview rateproposals
youtube ↗Cold Email

How do I do outreach and get faster results? I'm willing to spend $100 or more on it. Loom videos or asset based approach via sending automations.

Sure. Let me cover exactly how I would approach these hypothetical scenarios. If I had $100, here's exactly what I would do to acquire clients today. First, I would find the most affordable cold email stack, which is the biggest leverage. I’d use the Instantly growth plan at $37 per month, giving 5,000 emails a month and the ability to roll over non‑responding contacts. For mailboxes, I’d choose cheap inboxes at about $3 each; with five inboxes that’s $15 per month, providing roughly 100 emails per day per inbox. I’d also need two domains at about $20 total (non‑recurring yearly). That totals $37 + $20 + $15 = $72 for infrastructure in month one. Domain costs could be amortized, but I’ll treat them as out‑of‑pocket. Next, I’d get leads via Apollo and scrape them with Apify. Apollo’s scraper is about $120 per 1,000 leads, yielding roughly 600 email addresses, which works out to about $2 per 1,000 emails. Sending a two‑step sequence at 100 emails per day (50 new leads, 50 follow‑ups) over 30 days gives 1,500 emails per month. At $2 per 1,000 emails, that’s $3 for leads. Adding infrastructure, we’re at $75 total. With $75 you can reach 1,500 people, a cost per lead of five cents. Assuming a 3% reply rate, that’s 45 replies; with a 20% positive reply rate, that’s about nine positive replies, roughly one meeting every three days. Higher reply rates could increase meetings proportionally. You’d still have $25 left. I’d spend it on Upwork: each application costs about $3 after bidding/boosting, allowing roughly eight applications. At a 20% proposal‑to‑reply rate, that might yield two replies and possibly one meeting. Combined, this strategy could book about ten meetings in the first month for $100, a cost per meeting of $10. If your service is worth $1,000–$1,500, closing one yields a 15× ROI; conservatively over 90 days you could make $4,500 on a $300 spend for a 15× ROI. Adjusting for realistic closing rates (15‑25%) and reply rates could push ROI higher. Additionally, free Loom videos (under five minutes) can be used to follow up with leads acquired via cold email, adding extra meetings without extra cost. In short, with $100 you can run cold email, buy leads, spend a little on Upwork, and use Loom to follow up, potentially booking ten‑plus meetings and achieving a strong ROI.

cold emailoutreachupworkloom
youtube ↗Cold Email

Could you make a video showing how to serve clients with a larger budget, something like $5,000 to $15,000?

Sure, I can talk about it now and, if there’s enough demand, I’ll make a full video later. The reality is that with a bigger budget you can move everything about ten‑times faster, maybe even a hundred times faster. For example, most people are limited to about nine mailboxes sending 30 emails each per day – roughly 270 emails total, or 135 new leads per day in a two‑step sequence. If you scale up to 90 mailboxes at 30 emails each, you’re looking at 2,700 emails a day, or 1,350 new leads daily, for a very low monthly cost (around $270 if you use a mailbox reseller). At a 0.02% reply rate that’s 27 positive replies, which can translate to three calls a day. With a good campaign you can convert 10‑15 calls per day, and even if 30% drop off you still get seven to ten quality calls. Assuming 45‑minute calls, you can fill an entire day’s calendar and close a couple of deals daily. If each deal is $2K, that’s $4K a day, or about $80K a month running 20 days, not counting upsells or retainers. In short, if you’re well‑resourced you can realistically schedule $80K‑plus a month with a productized offer by going all‑in on cold email, as long as you have enough leads to fulfill the volume. This means broadening your top‑of‑funnel targeting across more general niches. For a $5K‑$15K budget, $270 is only about 2.7% of the spend, leaving roughly 4% of margin for growth.

budgetcold emailscale
youtube ↗Agency Operations

How do you handle pass-through credits for services like Appify, Chatp, and Instantly? Do the credits come out of your build, and how do you set this up?

No—I just get the client to pay for it. When I say pass through, the clients are paying for it. If you want to set it up, you have to do it manually, which sucks. You could update it once a month. If you have their Stripe, you could theoretically auto‑build using Stripe after calculating monthly token usage, but I don't think that's a good idea. The credits don't auto‑build; they stay manual. If you want to do pass‑through, tell the client how much the tokens cost at the end of the contract and then handle it. If you need it ongoing, you need a way to calculate token usage automatically. It's annoying, so I don't recommend it. Snapo thanks me for the free game. I record videos with OBS Studio; zooming or switching views is done live, not in post‑production, which cuts editing time and removes the need to publish to post. I've been building and documenting an automation as well. The fastest way to scale depends on where you are. If you lack demonstrated value, inbound won't work—you need proven results. I've built two agencies, one at $92K and another at $72K, and my agency will soon far exceed those numbers because I've grown the team. I've shown success doing what most people want: starting an agency in the agency space. People want to know how to do that, make money with it, bootstrap, and do cold emails. I'm good at all that, so when I talk about it it's like listening to a bank robber rate his top 10 heists, Lionel Messi rate his top 10 plays, or LeBron talk about dunking. I'm not claiming to be the LeBron of AI automation, but I am the LeBron of AI automation in terms of experience. If you don't have equivalent experience, inbound won't work. Your oldest video is 10 months old; if you've made less than $20K in 10 months (about $2K/month), you'd be better off starting with cold outreach instead of documenting your approach. I hate to say it, but that's the truth. The fastest way to scale really depends on your starting point. Hopefully I've made my point clear. I didn't start with YouTube videos; I made money first, got good at delivering value, then realized I could talk about it for hours, found it affordable to create content, gained authority, and started making videos—and it worked.

pass-throughcreditsStripescaling