#39 · $100K/Mo Founder Roasts Cold Emails From His Inbox

youtube ↗Cold Email

Anas sent 2,000 cold emails, received 8 positive replies (opportunities) but zero conversions; he is unsure whether a conversion means a booked meeting or a closed client, struggles to get people on calls, wonders how important it is to show the actual product video given his experience and social proof, and asks whether the product’s AI content automation needs to be strong beforehand or can be addressed later.

First, open-rate tracking is unreliable these days because many email clients either auto-open messages or block the tracking pixel, so a low open rate below 25% isn't something to worry about; instead, run a deliverability check with tools like Glock apps or Mail-Tester to see if your emails are landing in spam. Moving to the numbers, with 2,000 emails sent and 8 positive replies you have a 0.4% positive reply rate. In cold email a positive reply is any response that isn't an outright rejection (e.g., 'this sounds great' or 'more info please'). That rate isn't stellar but it's not terrible—I've seen campaigns in the 0.5-1% range still generate good revenue, and my best campaigns have hovered around 20% (I hedge and say 20% because I don't recall the exact figure). The gap between your 0.4% and my best results shows a major opportunity to improve, and a very low positive reply rate usually points to weak copy. To lift that rate you can work on three areas: copy, audience strategy, and tactical details like send times, days, spin-tax, and deliverability. Of these, copy is the biggest lever; I've had campaigns where everything else was poor but the copy was strong and the campaign still performed. My copy framework rests on three principles: make the message information-dense (use as few words as possible to convey the point), make it feel hyper-personalized (hand-crafted to the recipient), and optimize for the platform—specifically cold email, where you can control the profile preview, subject line, the first ~100 characters that appear in the inbox, any attachments and their file names/types, and use those as levers to boost opens and replies. Most people fail by writing long, generic introductions like 'Hello Nick, I run a super cool company…'; instead, treat the email like a handwritten note to a lover in the 19th century—customize the opening lines heavily. Once the email avoids looking like spam, the recipient's next questions are: who are you, why should I care, and what do you want? Answer 'who' with a brief, personalized intro (you can use AI to help) that establishes relevance; answer 'why' with social proof—e.g., a recent Microsoft project or $133K earned last month using this approach; answer 'what' with a clear call to action (chat, sell, call, video). By anticipating the reader's needs through radical empathy you'll see higher engagement. Beyond copy, make sure you're targeting the right audience (avoid blasting contractors who are unlikely to have time), pay attention to sending times and days, and follow deliverability best practices. If you're getting meetings but no closed deals, the problem shifts to your sales process: adopt a standardized consultative sales script that uncovers pain points, guides the conversation, and presses on those points; I provide such templates in Maker School and in the Make Money with Make.com community. Ultimately, you need to sharpen your consultative selling skills and standardize your sales process so it's not ad-hoc.

cold emailcopywritingdeliverabilitysales script

Related answers

youtube ↗Cold Email

Why does a well-performing email with a ~7% reply rate stop working after a week or two?

The issue is deliverability getting crushed, similar to cold calling. I run Clarvo, a power dialer that improves pickups, analogous to instant and cold email platforms. A common pattern: you start a campaign with a high pickup rate (e.g., 10%), it’s strong for the first three days, then each day the rate drops by 2‑3 %, quickly falling to 0.5‑1 % and you get squashed. This happens because big carriers and call registrars see the number making many calls, deem it illegitimate, lower its ranking and mark it as likely spam; the same occurs with your emails. Assuming this isn’t isolated, it repeats each time you send. Even if you think it’s not a deliverability problem, there are several causes: (1) Volume – you might be sending slightly too many emails per day. (2) Bounce – a percentage of emails bounce due to invalid servers, leading Gmail and Outlook to suspect automation. (3) Certain words trigger naive spam filters (the algorithms they use to judge legitimacy). (4) Recipients marking you as spam adds a signal that Google, Outlook and other platforms use; even one spam complaint per day out of 200 emails can significantly hurt deliverability over time. Additionally, ESPs, registrars and platforms continually tighten their filters; previously you could send 20‑40 emails per mailbox per day, now you need to stay around 15‑20, raising outreach costs. To test whether your emails are landing, avoid open‑rate tracking (it harms deliverability) and don’t track your main reply‑rate campaign. Instead create a separate campaign—for example, a free podcast campaign—pretend you’re a big YouTuber with a million followers and invite people to be on your podcast. Virtually nobody says no, giving you an easy “yes” to benchmark email performance with a real‑sounding offer (even if you can’t actually fulfill it). This bypasses deliverability placement tests, which are often unreliable. I personally run such a campaign constantly or turn it on when I suspect mailbox issues, directing a few emails to a compliment and an invitation to my podcast (which has over a million subscribers).

cold emaildeliverabilityreply rate
youtube ↗Cold Email

After seeing a drop in positive replies despite sending more emails, should I change my lead list, what cost‑effective suggestions do you have for asset‑based outreach via cold email, and what asset could I provide if I sold this value‑based outreach automation system?

Great job getting nine positive inquiries from 29 emails—that's a solid start. However, the drop-off to calls is significant; you're only converting about 20% of those positives, which is typical for a first attempt, so don't worry too much. The big lever to improve is your positive reply rate. If you could achieve around a 5% reply rate, that would be phenomenal—very few people hit that. Right now your conversion from replies to calls seems low, and many people have better conversion rates there. It looks like your deliverability may have suffered. Check whether your deliverability dropped; a 5% rate might have been a fluke given you only sent 209 emails. To verify, run deliverability tests using free tools like Glock Apps or Mailbox Tester. Regarding costs, you're using Claude to create seven LinkedIn posts. I don't know the current pricing, but if you shared it I could help you work it out. GPT‑4 is decent, though not as good as Claude 3.7, but still usable. You might experiment with GPT to see if it fits your budget. Finally, if you were to sell this value‑based outreach automation system, the asset you’d provide is exactly what you’re doing now: the system that creates those LinkedIn posts, the proof of concept, and the ability to tweak tone of voice and run everything on autopilot. That’s the product you’d sell.

cold emaildeliverabilitylead listasset
youtube ↗Lead Generation

What are the minimum tools needed to start getting clients, and should I focus on Upwork until I get some money coming in?

Josh's approach is perfect if you're not yet in the automation industry, don't have an automation business, or aren't freelancing; your only goal should be to go from zero to one as quickly as possible. Most people in Josh's situation try to jump from zero to a hundred right away, but the strategies for going from 0 to 1 are different from those needed to scale to 100. Josh is looking for a minimum viable strategy—similar to a minimum viable product—to avoid stagnation and quit, because he values feedback loops. This is the way I approach any business model in the 2020s, given how fast everything moves. Regarding your question about minimum tools and whether to focus on Upwork until you earn money: it depends on your financial situation. The quickest path from zero to one, in my experience, is to spam three methods: Upwork applications, cold emails, and community engagement. I call it spamming like a video game because, while quality matters, the law of large numbers ensures results if you send enough outreach. For Upwork, send many applications using a customized Loom video approach—record a short video saying, 'Hey, how's it going? I just saw your post for XYZ; let me show you exactly how I'd solve this.' Highlight your relevant experience (X, Y, Z) and past results. Even if you're new to Upwork, this personalized touch boosts your chances. For cold emails, use one of my offer formulas or cold email templates, then find an audience, split‑test two or three audiences, and gauge reply rates—especially positive replies. You can personalize with AI if you wish; my Nix cold email templates are available via the four‑step cold email copying system. For communities, identify groups and niches you're interested in (e.g., videography, dental clinic managers). Post hyper‑relevant content that provides value without selling immediately. For example, in a dental clinic manager community, share a strategy like 'end‑of‑insurance reactivation' that leaves voicemails about unused benefits. By consistently giving value over time, you become an authority and can start charging for your services. These three outreach methods—Upwork, cold emails, and community posting—constitute the minimum viable strategy for landing your first client.

upworkcold emailcommunity outreachlead generation
youtube ↗Cold Email

I ran my first cold email campaign with a 71% open rate but zero replies. Any advice on optimizing for replies?

A 71% open rate sounds impressive, but opens don’t matter if you get no replies. Stop obsessing over open metrics and focus on response rates. For your first test send around 500 emails—not a thousand—so you can verify deliverability before you turn off open tracking. Once you know the emails are landing, work on the copy: most cold‑email copy is weak, so study proven formulas (like the one in my 56‑minute video) and adapt them to your niche, such as gyms or personal trainers. Even a few percentage‑point lift in reply rate is worth it. Remember, sending 100 emails with no replies isn’t catastrophic, but 500 with zero replies indicates a problem that needs fixing.

cold emailopen ratereply optimization